Attorney advertising
[email protected]

FTC Rules on Reviews, Endorsements and Product Claims for Online Businesses

The FTC regulates how online businesses handle reviews, endorsements and product claims through Section 5 of the FTC Act, the Endorsement Guides and, since October 2024, a rule on consumer reviews and testimonials. Whether a practice such as an incentive, a follow-up email, a review request or an origin claim is a problem generally depends on what is said, what is offered, what is disclosed and how the seller’s platform and facts fit together.

Why do reviews draw regulatory attention?

Reviews work because shoppers treat them as independent. Bought, fabricated or filtered reviews mislead shoppers and shift sales away from businesses whose reviews are real. Both harms draw the FTC and Amazon. That is the idea behind Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices (15 U.S.C. § 45), and behind the FTC’s Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 465), which took effect on October 21, 2024. The rule addresses fake or false reviews, buying reviews, reviews by insiders, company-controlled review sites, review suppression and fake social media indicators. A knowing violation can lead to civil penalties. The rule is enforced by the agency, and it does not give private parties a right to sue under the rule itself.

Why are incentives treated with so much care?

The rule says a business may not provide compensation or incentives in exchange for, or conditioned expressly or by implication on, reviews expressing a particular sentiment (16 C.F.R. § 465.4). In its published questions and answers, the FTC has explained that the rule does not prohibit incentives for reviews as long as they are not conditioned on the sentiment of the review, but that failing to disclose an incentive could still violate the FTC Act under the Endorsement Guides (16 C.F.R. Part 255). The difference between a gift conditioned on a positive review and an offer made to all purchasers regardless of what they say can be subtle, and it can turn on wording, timing and what recipients are led to expect. Platform policies are often stricter than the rule, so a practice the rule does not reach still breaks a marketplace’s terms. Amazon’s Community Guidelines bar creating, editing or removing a review in exchange for payments, refunds, discounts, products, gift cards, warranties or services. Amazon Vine is the only Amazon-sanctioned incentive program.

Why does asking only happy customers raise a question?

A seller that solicits reviews only from customers it believes are satisfied may not be buying reviews in the rule’s sense, but the FTC has said such a practice could violate the FTC Act, because it can leave the displayed reviews unrepresentative. The related provision on review suppression bars unfounded legal threats, physical threats, intimidation and public false accusations made knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth and used to remove or prevent reviews. It also addresses suppression based on rating or sentiment while implying that displayed reviews reflect all or most. The rule leaves room for neutral criteria, such as removing reviews that disclose confidential information, are abusive or false or concern unrelated products. Where a given practice falls between those lines depends on how it is designed and described.

Why does the seller’s role matter?

The rule treats different roles differently. A business that merely hosts reviews written by others is treated differently from one that writes, buys or controls them, and the rule has provisions for insiders and company-controlled sites. Ordinary consumers who post reviews are not the rule’s target. For an online business that operates its own storefront, sells through marketplaces and works with affiliates or influencers, more than one role can be present at the same time, and the analysis may differ for each channel.

Why do endorsements and influencer posts belong in this discussion?

The Endorsement Guides (16 C.F.R. Part 255) address when a connection between an endorser and a brand, such as payment, gifted products or other benefits, should be disclosed so that readers can weigh the endorsement fairly. The brand is responsible for what its endorsers say and for undisclosed connections, even where the endorser is not liable. Endorsers and agencies carry their own liability (16 C.F.R. § 255.1(d) to (f)). Your contract decides who pays for a mistake, not who is liable to the FTC. See our pages on brand deals and talent agreements and the influencer protection article for the contract side of this.

Why is “Made in USA” its own subject?

The FTC’s Made in USA Labeling Rule applies to product labels and to a seal, mark, tag or stamp labeling a product Made in USA in catalogs and online promotional material, such as a product page (16 C.F.R. §§ 323.1, 323.3). An unqualified claim passes only if final assembly or processing happens in the United States, all significant processing happens in the United States and all or virtually all ingredients or components are made and sourced in the United States (16 C.F.R. § 323.2). A violation of the rule carries civil penalties. Origin claims in other advertising follow the same standard under Section 5 of the FTC Act. Supply chains that mix domestic and imported parts, or that rely on a contract manufacturer, can make a seemingly simple claim hard to support. Qualified claims, such as “assembled in USA with imported parts,” raise their own questions. See packaging compliance for how claims interact with labeling.

Why do other claims matter too?

Health, safety, efficacy, environmental and “natural” claims can all raise substantiation questions under the FTC Act, and claims that suggest a medical or pesticidal purpose may also move a product into another regulator’s territory. See FDA registration and clearance and EPA pesticidal claims. Competitors and consumers may also bring claims under state law, and marketplaces may act on complaints without any regulator being involved.

Why involve a lawyer?

These questions tend to arrive in a hurry: a marketplace warning, a competitor’s letter, a regulator’s inquiry or a program a marketing team wants to launch next week. We test a review or incentive program against the rule, the Endorsement Guides and Amazon’s policy at the same time, because a program the FTC allows often breaks Amazon’s terms. The rule is less than two years old and FTC enforcement under it is still taking shape, so recent cases matter. Most business owners who call us have already launched the program. Calling before launch costs less.

How do I get started?

Contact us. Tell us how you collect reviews, what you offer customers and what the listing claims, and we will tell you whether we can help.

Realistic expectations

  • We cannot guarantee how the FTC, a state, a competitor or a marketplace will treat a practice, or any particular outcome.
  • FTC guidance and enforcement priorities develop over time; confirm current rules.
  • Rules and agency guidance change, so check the current requirement for your product.
  • Past results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Frequently asked questions

Does the FTC rule ban giving customers an incentive for a review?
Not by itself. The FTC rule bars incentives tied to a positive review. Failing to disclose an incentive still breaks the FTC Act. Amazon goes further. Amazon bars payment, refunds, free products or other rewards for reviews outside Amazon Vine. On Amazon, any incentive for a review puts your account at risk.
Can I ask only my satisfied customers for reviews?
It is risky. The FTC has said that soliciting reviews only from customers thought to be happy could violate the FTC Act, because it may leave displayed reviews unrepresentative. Whether a given process crosses the line depends on how it is designed, what is displayed and what is said about it.
Can a seller remove negative reviews?
Only in limited circumstances. The rule bars unfounded legal threats, intimidation and false accusations made knowingly or with reckless disregard for the truth to suppress reviews, and it addresses suppression based on sentiment while implying displayed reviews are representative. Neutral criteria, such as confidential information, abusive or false content and unrelated products, are treated differently. Platform terms also apply.
Who is liable under the FTC review rule?
Businesses are the rule’s focus. The FTC states that ordinary consumers cannot be liable, and that a mere review host is exempt from certain provisions. Knowing violations can bring civil penalties through the agency, and there is no private right of action under the rule. Your role in each channel affects the analysis.
When can I say Made in USA?
The FTC’s Made in USA Labeling Rule describes conditions for an unqualified label claim, including final assembly or processing in the United States, significant processing in the United States and all or virtually all components being made and sourced here. Mixed supply chains often need a closer look, and qualified claims raise separate issues.
Do influencer posts fall under these rules?
Often, yes. The Endorsement Guides require disclosure of payment, gifted products and similar connections. The brand answers to the FTC for its endorsers’ posts, and the endorser and any agency carry their own liability. Your contract decides who bears the cost.

Brand deals and talent agreements

Endorsement terms and FTC disclosure.

Packaging compliance

Origin claims and labels.

FDA registration and clearance

When claims point to another regulator.

Weaponized Compliance

Documented violations by competitors.

Sources and notes

About the author

Paul S. Rafelson is the Founder of Rafelson Law PLLC, a law firm for eCommerce and online business owners. The firm’s practice focuses on Amazon account issues, eCommerce mergers and acquisitions, Proposition 65 and related corporate work. He holds an LL.M. in Taxation from NYU (2017). He founded the Online Merchants Guild in 2018, a volunteer-led trade association run by and for Amazon sellers. He taught state and local taxation as an adjunct professor at Pace Law School. Katherine (Katie) Dariano is a Senior Counsel at the firm. Full biography.

Background

  • Founder, Rafelson Law PLLC; office at 2255 Glades Rd, Suite 319A, Boca Raton, FL 33431.
  • Admitted to the bars of Florida (2005) and New Jersey (2006). Katherine Dariano is admitted in New York (2021).
  • LL.M. in Taxation, NYU (2017).
  • Before private practice, Paul was in-house counsel at Microsoft, Walmart and GE.
  • Paul founded the Online Merchants Guild in 2018, a volunteer-led trade association run by and for Amazon sellers. More on the Guild's About page.
  • Paul taught state and local taxation as an adjunct professor at Pace Law School.

Talk to a lawyer about reviews, endorsements and claims

Bring the review program, the offers you make and the claims on your listings.

Call (833) 326-6529 Email Us

Rafelson Law PLLC · 2255 Glades Rd, Suite 319A, Boca Raton, FL 33431

Phone: (833) 326-6529 · Email: [email protected]

Informational only; not legal advice. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship, which begins only with a signed written engagement. Please do not send confidential details until we confirm in writing that we represent you. If you face a deadline, say so in your first message.

CallEmail Us